Friday, May 11, 2012

Gig: Richard Pinhas

Richard Pinhas (CCMC / Roman Pilates)

The Boat. Thursday, May 26, 2011.

A Burn Down The Capital show upstairs at The Boat brought the promise of some diverse forms of "noise" on a Thursday night. It was interesting to note that the average age of those on hand was about twenty years older than many of Tad's shows, which I attributed to the presence of CCMC on the bill. That also made me wonder how they'd react to the opening act, whose status as a noise band needs no scarequotes.

In fact Roman Pilates1 began with a disclaimer2 before his set started off with a skittering hiss, like butter in a frying pan, or maybe the amplified rustle of insects, building slowly in volume in the dark for five minutes. Crump would occasionally wander to the back of the room to check on the sound. There was a burst of radio noise, then a moment's silence, and then it all went haywire, audiovisually speaking.

Now, popping, spark-like noises gave way to a harsh grumble underneath — slowly transforming to a sound not unlike the hypnotoad,3 and then slowly becoming a noise that sounded almost exactly like a car racing game I had on the Vic 20 in 1983.

After a gentle, swooping synth-y interlude came the hands-on noise, with Crump employing large metal canisters used percussively with contact mics attached inside. And "percussively", in this case, ramped up from thumping them to Crump wearing them over his arms and thrashing about like a malfunctioning robot and, ultimately, dashing them to the floor.

Cables still trailing from them, Crump abandoned the cans ten feet from his table of gear, and the last segment consisted of banging more mic'ed items while switching around patch cables. Not all the noises were pleasant, natch, but there was an enjoyable element of "performance" here. And, somewhat to my surprise, the older crowd on hand seemed mostly into the abrasiveness.

It's hard to convey the kineticism of the action segments with sound, but you can listen to one of the quieter interludes here.

Free-improvising since 1974, CCMC is as much of an institution as its acronym-ish moniker might suggest.4 Original founders of The Music Gallery (as their own performance space, before evolving into the independent entity it is today), the group is a living, shifting organism. Now a core trio of Michael Snow, John Oswald & Paul Dutton, for this show they were supplemented by fourth member on syndrums and laptop.

There was a bit of a fine line between the band warming up and when they were performing. Everyone was tuning up and noodling along, and when Snow wandered up to stage with a beer and settled in, it gradually coalesced into "playing". At the outset, Dutton's throat-mumblings were matched by Snow's corresponding analog synth whirrings, syndrum rhythms tapping along. And then a different howl from Oswald's saxophone shifted things to a slightly different patch of ground.

The sheer freeness of CCMC's music is probably a lot to take for anyone encumbered by a conventional sense of harmony or melody. It can be ungainly, even to the point of sounding like "noise" in the musical sense, but it's not random or amorphous, bounded as it is by the realtime interaction of the performers listening to each other and responding. The neophyte might think they've found something to cling to on seeing a vocalist, but Dutton is less of a singer than a sound poet in the tradition of bpNichol — a phoneme-gun operator emitting voice bursts that tantalizingly don't quite cohere at the level of comprehendibility.

Here, Dutton's vocals hit a stretch of sounding like Donald Duck being strangled while sputtering out half-syllables of objections (with Oswald's sax in chipping in with similarly rapid bursts), and at other times more like a Captain Beefheart interpretation of "Spoonful" as performed by a cat horking up a hairball. The best bit came at the end of the first piece, when after a period of skittering electroacoustic noise sculpture, Dutton took the equivalent of a solo, the vocal noises slowing unclenching into comprehensible words, eventually settling into a self-referential monologue musing on trying to find the best bit of the song ("This is actually my favourite part coming up... wait, you'll hear...") and becoming increasingly befuddled at facing a sort of Zeno's paradox where the moment you're waiting for never quite arrives, especially as the sonic landscape all around is constantly shifting and suddenly you've passed it.

That piece lasted about twenty-five minutes, and was followed by another one half that length that tilted the ratio away from "pulsation" and toward "whirring". Perhaps most surprising is how much variability there is in the off-kilter soundworlds the band was exploring: even when it's four kinds of oscillation unwinding at once, sometimes it's quite fabulous and elevatingly goofy — and seconds later slightly off-putting meandering caterwauling. On the whole, though, it's quite entertaining, and provoked literal howls of approval from the crowd.

Listen to an excerpt from this set here.

CCMC clearly had the biggest crowd of the night — after they finished and the clock rolled toward midnight, it noticeably thinned out. Perhaps it was getting past the older crowd's bedtime, but the night's headliner was, in fact Richard Pinhas. Starting with his work with Heldon in the 70's, Pinhas is one of France's pre-eminent electronic rock pioneers. Here, he was joined by his son Duncan, who took up more real estate on the stage, with a table filled with electronics and a laptop. Père, seated beside him, only had a volume pedal — not even an amp, with his guitar going straight into fils' setup.

This pair also pretty much just launched right into it, like they were dipping mid-stream from some glorious Eno-esque drift. A sustained glide rose from Richard's guitar, and was slowly swallowed up by modulated looping courtesy of Duncan's laptop, who peered at his screen as if evaluating a particularly fiendish sudoku. There was a constantly shifting source of raw sonic material for sculpting, with Richard effortlessly tossing off ruffled bits of Fripp-ery that moved into trebly staccato bursts.

Slowly, the guitar built from atmospheric to something heavier, almost David Gilmour-esqe as a static-y oscillation underneath gave a vague rhythmic framework which slowly turned into regularized pre-programmed beatz. Although the two weren't closely watching each other, they were definitely responding to each others' musical cues, often in a chess game-like way, with one's strategy responded to with crafty counterfeints.

It was only toward the end that they leaned in and passed a few words back and forth, trying to line up their exit strategy. And soon the guitar faded into the echoing distance against vocoderish garblesounds and the whole thing melted into silence. The piece ran about twenty-two minutes, with some really satisfactory passages in there.

But that, somewhat surprisingly, would turn out to be it, and the pair started packing up. Rather short for a full set, but I guess they got across what they wanted to. An intriguing introduction to Pinhas' soundworld and a nicely-curated night.

You can listen to an except from this set (and a reinterpretation!) here. And if you want more, I passed my recording on to Pinhas, and he has made it available on his soundcloud.


1 The project is the bandonym of Kevin Crump, also of Disguises and some other local noise units, as well as head of Wintage Records.

2 It's always an interesting sign when there's a disclaimer up front:

Kevin Crump: For your information... the light for the first five minutes will be out. After that you will be bombarded with some epileptic light projections...

Crowdmember: [interjecting] What is this, a Reg Hartt screening?

Kevin Crump: ...if you have any kind of medical condition... I give you advance warning now.

3 All glory to the hypnotoad.

4 Originally standing for "Canadian Creative Music Collective", the name has more generally become a backronym for whatever suits the musicians' whims.

Wednesday, May 9, 2012

Recording: Khaira Arby

Artist: Khaira Arby

Song: unknown*

Recorded at Lula Lounge, May 8, 2012.

Khaira Arby - unknown

Full review to follow. With troubled times reigning in her native Timbuktu, Arby was an emissary for peace — one more way in which she could be said to be a powerful voice. Her hotshot young backing band got increasingly maximalist as the night went on, with interlocking guitar lines building up to scorching solos, but amping it up never threatened to topple things into too-muchness. A top-notch night.

* Does anyone know the title to this one? Please leave a comment!

Tuesday, May 8, 2012

Hot Docs 2012: Wrap-up

Thoughts and rankings from the 2012 Hot Docs Canadian International Documentary Festival, Toronto, Canada.

Another year done, award winners announced, and time to take stock before my brain forgets what I saw. Reviews have run for everything I've seen this year (click on the Hot Docs tag below to find 'em), but I've done a top-to-bottom ranking of them all below. And meanwhile, a few thoughts on the festival, as well:

  • Busier than ever? It's no surprise that the festival is bragging once again about record-breaking attendance — almost everything I went to (even weekday afternoons) saw full houses. Plus, I heard from a couple people who had tried to rush shows, arriving an hour in advance and not getting in, something which was generally unheard of in years past. It's going to be a welcome challenge for the festival to continue to deal with success — to grow while still keeping things accessible.
  • Bye, bye Cumberland. As well, the festival will now need to find at least a couple more new screens for next year with the sudden (but not unexpected) closing of the Cumberland. I must admit I have no huge love for the venue as a movie-seeing place (to have to go to The Cumberland after seeing a movie in Lightbox 3 felt grim, indeed), but like anyone who loves movies in Toronto, I do have my share of warm memories of the place. Plus, no matter what happens, this will inevitably spread the festival's screens further apart, breaking to the easy-walking triangle of Bader/ROM/Cumberland.
  • Retrospective love. I've said it before, and I'm sure I'll say it next year: the retrospective programs are often the most fascinating things going at Hot Docs, especially when they feature an engaging filmmaker who shows up with a willingness to share their memories. (John Kastner did a great job this year.) Yet these were also the least-attended screenings that I experienced at the festival. I don't know if these are inherently "niche", but it seems like there must be something more that the festival can do to get people to those screenings. I certainly hope that the festival continues to curate these on the basis of merit, and not try to program the retrospectives based just on celebrity appeal.
  • A bra! Y'know, I got sick of these promos pretty quickly a year ago, so it was dispiriting to see them make a comeback before every screening. On the other hand, though, kudos to the festival for sparing us from an enforced automobile advertisement (or similar commercial) before every screening.
  • Preliminary matters. Speaking of the pre-screening rituals, I know we all get sick of it pretty quickly, but I was mildly taken aback by how quickly and casually the programmers rushed through their introductory comments, with a couple bursting through them like they'd rather be anywhere else than reminding people to turn off their cellphones. This was more strongly felt in movies that were co-presentations with other local festivals — as the (second) biggest kid on the film festival block, there's a real chance here to turn people on to some of the city's other festivals, and something as simple as stopping to say a word about who the co-presenters are and when their festival is could really do something to implant a seed in people's minds. Of all the screenings I saw, only Lynne Fernie didn't just rush through mentioning the co-presenter, instead pausing to give an impromptu, heartfelt shout-out to imagineNATIVE.
  • Search woes. I didn't think I'd still be complaining about this a year later, but the search engine on the Hot Docs website is truly useless. After several instances of typing the exact title of a film into the search box, and then finding the movie on page four or five of the search results, I gave up and just started tearing out my hair.

And here is my ranked list of everything I managed to see. It kinda lumps towards the middle — outside of the retrospective, I didn't see any truly excellent documentaries this year, but at the same time, I saw fewer that I disliked as well.

Excellent

Les ordres

Pour la suite du monde

Fighting Back

Very Good

Meet the Fokkens

The Revisionaries

We Are Wisconsin

Michel Brault: Shorts

The Waiting Room

She Said Boom: The Story of Fifth Column

Oma & Bella

Aaron Burr, Part 2

Good

Rage Against the Darkness: Bunny and Leona

Pot Country

Price of Gold

The Ambassador

The Reluctant Revolutionary

The Young Man Was

The Man That Got Away

Canned Dreams

Hunting Bobby Oatway

Pushwagner

The Invisible War

Made In China

Decent

China Heavyweight

The Tundra Book. A Tale of Vukvukai, the Little Rock

Who Cares

Smoke Traders

Espoir Voyage

Grandmothers

We Are Legion: The Story of the Hacktivists

Ask a Silly Question

Duds

Dragan Wende - West Berlin

Polish Illusions

Monday, May 7, 2012

Hot Docs 2012: Reviews #9

Reviews of screenings from the 2012 Hot Docs Canadian International Documentary Festival, Toronto, Canada.

The Reluctant Revolutionary (Dir: Sean McAllister, 69 minutes, UK)

Kais is barely making a living as a guide in his native Yemen when his economic prospects suddenly get a lot worse — nothing keeps the tourists away like massive political unrest. One camera-toting "tourist" (director Sean McAllister) remains behind to watch things unfold. As tensions ratchet up in the country, we get to witness not only the growing demands for freedom and democracy, but a change in Kais as well. At the outset, he's not overtly political and declares that president-for-life Saleh is doing a good job and keeping things stable. As he sees the brutal lengths to which the regime will go to prolong its reign, he slowly becomes the titular reluctant revolutionary.

The film is shot with a you-are-there first-person immediacy. This can be stirring and make us feel like witnesses to history in the making. The shots of crowds building in "Change Square" are at first like a joyful festival ("it's just like Glastonbury!" proclaims a chuffed McAllister) and later a scene of tragic horror as the army opens fire (and uses some U.S.-supplied nerve gas) against unarmed civilians. The downside is that there is also some really dodgy amateur camera-work — for the film's first few minutes I thought I was going to get vertigo from McAllister's shaky, wildly veering camera.

Fortunately, that does settle down as the story progresses, especially as it moves into the quieter territory of hanging out with Kais. Besides giving us a welcome dose of what things are like for an educated, khat-chewing regular guy, it's also a poignant depiction of the moral calculations undertaken by anyone who's swept up in something bigger than themself — how far should I go to risk my life and my family's security in the name of some abstract ideal? How far can you be pushed before you have to take a stand?

As an observer, McAllister's motives are never made very clear. One assumes that he is a journalist, despite his continued denials of such to the authorities. He sensibly worries about his own skin and how his presence might cause trouble for his Yemeni friends, but as the tension mounts, things tip a bit too far in trying to make us worry about the fate of this one European as opposed to the thousands out in the street. But on the whole, this is an effective document of the finer details of life during the Arab Spring.

We Are Wisconsin (Dir: Amie Williams, 90 minutes, USA)

Another you-are-here account of a political uprising, this film shifts to the American midwest to follow the efforts of a rookie governor to bring his State's financial house in order. Just a few days into his new job, Scott Walker introduced an omnibus "Budget Repair Bill" that seemed to have a hidden agenda, giving the boon of public sell-offs to his out-of-state big-money supporters while gutting not only union benefits, but the very right of collective bargaining itself.

It was the latter that immediately rallied public-sector union workers to fight, and quickly workers and students (Madison is also a big college town) were organizing protests that grew by orders of magnitude with every passing day.

Taking us behind the scenes, and guiding us through the events with an articulate range of subjects, the film does a stirring job of showing a people-power revolution, American-style. The Rotunda of the beautiful State Capitol is soon packed with occupying citizens, determined to exercise their democratic rights up-close and in person.

Along the way, things get bogged down from all angles, as Republican state senators look for a way to pass the budget bill in the absence of a quorum denied them by Democratic legislators who have fled across state lines to slow the process down. And the big picture of the protests gets swallowed up somewhat by small-scale tactical battles.

But it's the passion of the subjects that pulls things through, from social service workers who demonstrate how the removal of their collective agreements will have adverse effects on their ability to help their clients to a rare feel-good police story, with law-enforcement officials rising above the divide-and-conquer temptations to not fight against a bill that would have exempted them... this time around.

Seeing how this bold action served to galvanize such a huge response, the cynical take from this is that the Tea Party faction was dumb to do this so fast and openly. As we're seeing in our own country right now, workers' rights can eroded more effectively when slowly done behind a bland façade (and even longer omnibus bills). Hopefully the lessons learned and spirit gained by the progressive forces will be enough to counter new skulduggery and massive financial infusions from shadowy right-wing forces.

Plus, this movie should work as a very effective agitprop tool to support its cause. After receiving the longest and loudest applause that I witnessed during the festival, director Williams told the crowd that the film is going to be deployed all across Wisconsin in the buildup to the June 5th gubernatorial recall election. Forward, proud badgers!

Polish Illusions (Dir: Jacob Dammas/Helge Renner, 85 minutes, Poland/Germany/Denmark/France)

Darłowo, Poland is a beautiful resort on the Baltic. Home to hordes to invading tourists during the summer, this film follows a couple locals each connected by their own illusions.

For Jan Konstantynow, those are quite literal. A retired fisherman focused on his magic act, Konstantynow fondly remembers the Communist days, when an illusionist was treated with some respect. These days, the town's young new cultural planner wants to freshen things up to fill his newly-renovated auditorium.

Mark Buller, a retired American military pilot, was attracted to the town by its large annual military re-enactment festival and decided to stay. A fetishist for military hardware, he loves restoring old vehicles but also pines for a new companion to fill the void left in his life by his wife's passing. Going through life with an oblivious, obnoxious bluster (he should wear a sweatshirt with "STEREOTYPICAL AMERICAN" in stencilled letters), he can't seem to connect with the local women.

There's potential here for this to unfold into something interesting, but it simply does not. At one level, the film is hamstrung by the fact that Buller isn't all that compelling of a character, but overall it was the whole presentation that I found offputting. Filmed from a tripod and employing a cloyingly precious omniscient voiceover, the film gave the impression that it wanted to be anything but a documentary. And yes, yes, all filmic reality is constructed etc. etc., and shots from a handheld camera do not imbue more veracity — but the whole construction here, convenient character arcs included, gives this the feel of a "quirky" small town comedy, but it just never pays off.

We see Konstantynow build himself up only for the "reveal" that he's stumblingly incompetent, and eventually try and embrace the new capitalist ethos. We also see Buller learn to tone down his personality enough to find love — but by the time this happens I was long past caring.

The tone employed here might work well for others — there were laughs in the theatre at material that pained me — but I would advise skipping this one.

Sunday, May 6, 2012

Hot Docs 2012: Reviews #8

Reviews of screenings from the 2012 Hot Docs Canadian International Documentary Festival, Toronto, Canada.

Fighting Back (Dir: John Kastner, 85 minutes, Canada)

This is the saddest story I have ever heard. There's something awful about the death of a child, of potential lost, dreams unrealized. At the turn of the 1980's, there were big advances being made in the treatment of cancer, but for children diagnosed with leukemia the outlook was not good. This film follows several families in London, Ontario as they face up to the grim facts. The bright hope is Tony Coutinho, 16, who has been in remission for several years, and his presence brings comfort to a group of parents who have gathered together for mutual support.

The greatest focus is on thirteen-year-old Michael Cluff, a class clown and devoted follower of Steve Martin. With so much energy and joy in life it seems simply unbelievable that he is gravely ill, and as the cancer takes over his bloodstream he seems to burn with an intense flame.

As we watch those and other stories unfold with grim precision, the film touches on a lot of other issues. Most notably, coming at the time when Kübler-Ross was first coming in vogue, is the question of how much should a child know about their medical condition? Should they be told they are dying? If parents think a child shouldn't be told, should authorities be forced to comply with that? This exact scenario unfolds in front of us, with a hospital social worker over-riding the wishes of Michael's parents and tell him more about his prognosis than they wanted. The movie also looks at the enormous pressures this work places on the medical staff whose work involves around dying children.

It's a crushing film that evokes rage and anguish. But it's also an extraordinarily empathetic account that gives us a chance to understand, without manipulative sensationalism, what these families are going through. Even if it's tough to "like", it's a powerful and unforgettable film — one of the few times where I saw a filmmaker nod sympathetically when an audience sat in silence rather than applauding as the film ended.

This was also a moving close to the festival's "Focus On" retrospective, and as with the other entries, Kastner's engaging presence to talk about his work truly enhanced the presentations. Hot Docs at its best.

Pushwagner (Dir: August B. Hanssen/Even Benestad, 68 minutes, Norway)

Terje Brofos, who works under the nom de guerre Pushwagner, wants nothing to do with a polite, mainstream Norwegian life. That much is obvious from his drawings and paintings, which create a vision of banal bourgeois respectability melding into the grim facelessness of an identity-crushing hive-mind, rows upon rows of identically-dressed businessmen marching like cogs in some brave new world.

That palpable dislike of polite society extends into Brofos' life as well, and his ingrained disrespectful iconoclasm seems like more than a façade. That could make him, as people say, "authentic" — a romantic figure who is living his art. It could also make him a pampered jerk, someone who is indulged by a constant series of acolytes to the point where he can generally act as he sees fit without being called to account.

As the film progresses, we see several sides of Brofos: addict, hardworking artist, petulant control freak, and frail old man. The documentary takes on a self-aware "meta" quality as we see Brofos break the fourth wall and push back against the film crew, made explicit with some scenes of Brofos seated in a control room, attempting to seize power of the process. His desire to be in control makes more sense when we see him involved in court proceedings against a former personal assistant to whom he conveyed thousands of works at a time when he was living on the street, almost certainly drug-addled and quite likely not in a fit mental state to be signing contracts.

That makes Brofos less than a likeable guy throughout, but he does orchestrate an amusing spectacle around him. As a portrait of the artist as an eccentric crank, this does a good job, with the visual style well in sync with its subject.

Screens with: Aaron Burr, Part 2 (Dir: Dana O'Keefe, 8 minutes, USA) which gives the third Vice-President of the United States a chance to reclaim his legacy in a stylish (almost Tarantino-esque) burst. The man who nearly seized the presidency in the "revolutionary" election of 1800 is nearly forgotten today, reduced to a footnote and remembered for one extraordinary event. In this film, Burr's iconoclastic image as a man out of time is cemented with shots of him (in period dress) walking through contemporary New York (where he had been one of the founders of what is now the Chase Manhattan Bank) and across the river in Weehawken, New Jersey, where the site of America's most notorious dual is now an unglamourous parking lot. We even see him trading insults with Alexander Hamilton via text message before speeding off to Mexico in a flashy sports car. A delightful bit of energetic revisionism, this was the best short that I saw at the festival.

The Invisible War (Dir: Kirby Dick, 99 minutes, USA)

The numbers are shocking. One in five women in the American armed forces is sexually assaulted in the time they serve — and those are the numbers for those who make formal reports. The actual numbers are certainly far higher, but there are great disincentives for servicewomen to initiate the process: many who do are punished, stripped of their rank or discharged, and often the authority to whom they would have to report is a peer of the perpetrator — if not the perpetrator himself.

In this meticulous documentary, we are introduced to several women who dare to tell their stories on camera as we are guided through the systemic elements that allow rape and sexual assault to continue. The film also advocates for one specific change in the military justice system: to establish an independent reporting authority outside the chain of command, to reduce the massive discretion that unit commanders have to simply sweep incidents under the rug. There's also a call for a culture change to get past a deeply-ingrained blame-the-victim mentality — "ask her when she's sober" posters are no answer.

But for all the powerful strength we see from the women profiled in the film, and the positive momentum of a Mr. Smith Goes to Washington-style ending, there's still the lingering sense that the film doesn't cut deep enough. There's a stronger critique of the hierarchical/patriarchal militaristic structure to be made that the film shies away from, as well as the myriad ways that mindset seeps into the wider American consciousness. Any institution — and any society — that is blithely accepting of the idea that rape is an "occupational hazard" for women serving their country is badly broken and violating the most elementary principles of liberty and justice.

Recording: Kids on TV

Artist: Kids on TV

Song: Cloudbusting [Kate Bush cover]

Recorded at Studio Threatre, Harbourfront Centre (Hatch Program), May 5, 2012.

Kids on TV - Cloudbusting

Full review to follow. Kids on TV took advantage of the Hatch artistic residency program at Harbourfront to find ways to stage some of the new songs from their forthcoming Pantheon album. The songs are indeed a celebration of the band's pantheon of heroes, with songs about Liberace, Vanessa Paradis, Robert Rauschenberg, John Rechy and more. But it was also a celebration of another pantheon, the band's community of artists who joined them on stage. With Gentleman Reg and Katie Stelmanis (now of Austra) joining in as part of the choir for this set-closer, my mind drifted back to when I saw the band tackle this before nearly three years ago. John O'Regan (Diamond Rings) was also a guest on stage at both shows, and it's worth celebrating to consider that these artists are still working together as they've grown and set off on their own trajectories.

Saturday, May 5, 2012

Hot Docs 2012: Reviews #7

Reviews of screenings from the 2012 Hot Docs Canadian International Documentary Festival, Toronto, Canada.

Michel Brault: Shorts [shorts programme]

Closing out the Outstanding Achievement Award Retrospective was this trio of short works made for the National Film Board. Les raquetteurs (Dir. Michel Brault/Gilles Groulx, Canada, 1958, 15 min.) was the best of the lot, with its rigid application of the Direct Cinema approach. No interfering narration in this one, just a careful montage to give us the impression of a snowshoeing competition in Sherbrooke. A gorgeous-looking time capsule.

La lutte (Dir. Michel Brault/Claude Jutra/Marcel Carrière/Claude Fournier, Canada, 1961, 28 min) was a good contrast, showing how much of an imposition a voiceover can feel in comparison. As impressive as that list of talent in the committee-of-directors was, the credits revealed even more of an NFB dream team, with well-known names such as Don Owen listed among the camera operators. However that multi-headed beast might be a sign there was less of an authorial "voice" here, and this film felt more populist in its structure. Perhaps that befits the topic, which spent a lot of time watching the audience of a wrestling match. Regardless of the approach, this was a beautiful-looking film, with plenty shots of the old Montréal Forum and the well-dressed crowd who put today's sporting attendees to shame. Focusing on the ritualized elements of the wrestling match (replete with good-triumphs-over-evil storylines) as well as its athleticism, it's also a souvenir of a different time when a film about wrestling didn't even passingly reference the underlying fakeness of the "sport" (to say nothing of the rampant homoeroticism).

The sexualized gaze was more openly acknowledged in Quebec-USA ou l'invasion pacifique (Dir. Michel Brault/Claude Jutra, Canada, 1962, 27 min) which got amusingly sidetracked from its account of American tourists in Vieux-Québec to simply drift along into girlwatching. That would be just one element here showing the progression of Direct Cinema into more personal and experimental forms of expression. Here, there felt like something of a clean delineation between the two directors, with the early part of the film following an American sailor on leave with his girlfriend taking a guided tour through the Old City in his giant convertible. Things got weirder after that, starting with a display of marching guards insouciantly flipping upside down and marching backwards as the audio slipped into an abstracted collage. The whole latter section (that girlwatching included) came off as pure Jutra, something you could easily extend to his later, more psychedelic work (like 1969's Wow). Quite fabulous.

Overall, a very fine retrospective of Brault's works. The only disappointment was that his attendance at the festival was limited to a couple insider-y events, not dropping in to any of the screenings to discuss his work with the hoi-polloi. But still, screening-for-screening, the best thing going at Hot Docs.

Smoke Traders (Dir: Jeff Dorn/Catherine Bainbridge, 51 minutes, Canada)

If you know budget-conscious people who smoke, you probably know someone who smokes "Indian cigarettes", sold on the cheap and showing up in a variety of informal packagings. This movie examines the phenomena from the perspective of the Mohawks who have pioneered the industry. Because of geography and history, the Mohawks have been at the centre of several controversies, growing from simply bringing untaxed cigarettes across the St. Lawrence River back in the 90's to a growing native-owned manufacturing sector today.

When we see before-and-after shots of their communities, it's hard not to feel some measure of support for anything that gives people steady jobs, better homes and some manner of economic clout. As the film introduces us to some of the new generation of entrepreneurs, we see how muddy the waters are. Brian White, a former smuggler, wants a safer and more respectable job and has a dream to open a solar panel plant. Robbie Dickson wants to go legit and take on the big tobacco companies at their own game — not just manufacturing his own cigarettes but even taking the trouble to pay the excise tax that should make his product legally marketable. Both face the frustration of bureaucratic quagmires that keep them from taking flight, as if designed to trap their communities in the status quo.

Especially in Dickson's case, there's an underlying current here that all levels of government (as well as the broader public at large) want to sweep this under the rug, not merely out of racism or neglect as much as a strong disinclination to really have to face up to thinking through what Aboriginal Sovereignty means in the twenty-first century. If the Mohawks truly are a nation that has made binding deals with the Canadian state, how does this play out? For well over a century, the general approach has been to ignore the question by papering over the cracks. What will happen if someone like Dickson stands up long enough to force governments to truly deal with this?

So there are a lot of fascinating questions invoked by this film. Sadly, though, one of the overarching ones is ignored: does it make a difference that the product at hand is a poisonous death-bringer? Do the Mohawks care that they're promoting cancer while robbing governments of the tax dollars required for the health care their products will create? Do they see this as a sly form of payback against their colonizers? Ignoring this giant blind spot only serves to undermine a lot of the sympathy that the film otherwise engenders for its protagonists.

Screens with: Pot Country (Dir: Mario Furloni/Kate McLean, 27 minutes, USA), a fascinating visit to Humboldt County, California, where marijuana cultivation is the leading economic activity. Giving us a quick historical overview on how hippie back-to-the-landers accidentally gave the region a new economic identity, this film is set against the campaign for Proposition 9, which would legalize their industry.

This causes mixed emotions from area residents — while it would mean they would no longer have to conduct their careers in secret, it would also bring them back into a mainstream/taxpaying relationship with the government that they moved here to avoid. Plus, it would open the way for big business to step in and put smallholders out of business, just as the area had seen a century before during the logging era. After all, those scummy lobbyists that are suddenly showing up at their doorsteps are being paid by someone, right? This creates a situation where the residents' best interests, in fact, are against the legalization of their work. A beautiful-looking film, this expanded thesis project handles all these threads quite well in its running time, and was the best mid-length doc I saw at the festival this year.

Price of Gold (Dir: Sven Zellner/Chingunjav Borkhuu, 86 minutes, Germany)

Mongolia is in the midst of a monumental, nation-transforming gold rush, with giant multinationals (including some of Canada's notoriously venal mining companies) staking their claims. Well, why shouldn't the locals get a piece of the action, then?

Suddenly "ninjas" (former nomads digging unsanctioned mines) are dotting the landscape, and in this film, we follow the adventures of one small crew, from Day 1, when they simply slow up in a scrubby, rocky corner of the Gobi Desert and start digging. No megaproject, this mine is just a hole in the ground dug with sweat, shovels and a balky Chinese jackhammer. A few crude sticks of dynamite help dislodge the rock, and they're just one dangerous element in this laissez-faire workplace. Split between bosses (who stake the capital to buy the equipment and outfit the crew) and workers, we watch them dig down for more then ten meters over twenty days, giving up after finding only quartz and moving to a more promising (but less hidden) location.

Along the way, we get to meet the members of the mining crew, and both bosses and workers alike agree that they would rather be living a traditional herding life, in tune with nature instead of poisoning the landscape with the mercury used to separate gold from stone. In fact, the general view is that they are living a cursed life, doomed to suffer misfortune for the disharmony they are creating. But such is the economic imperative.

We also get close in on the workings of the miners, so things get a little claustrophobic as we descend deep into the narrow mineshafts. I might have felt I was in danger of contracting silicosis just from watching this, but it was an enriching experience. Recommended.

Friday, May 4, 2012

Hot Docs 2012: Reviews #6

Reviews of screenings from the 2012 Hot Docs Canadian International Documentary Festival, Toronto, Canada.

The Young Man Was (Part 1: United Red Army) (Dir: Naeem Mohaiemen, 70 minutes, Bangladesh)

The 1977 hijacking of Japan Airlines Flight 472 might not ring a lot of bells on this side of the world, but it made a large impact on director Mohaiemen as a young child, even if it was then mostly because the live news coverage pre-empted The Zoo Gang, his favourite program. Now, the incident serves as a fulcrum in The Young Man Was, his multimedia exploration of the 70's ultra-left. His broad artistic interests (other parts of the project include journal essay, live performance, video wall, photography-text sequence, installation and collage) give a hint that he's interested in playing with artistic form, and this film (co-presented with the Images Festival) is indeed anything but a standard documentary.

Even if this did receive live-on-tv coverage, the mediasphere of 1977 was far less overwhelming than it is now, so the formal constraint here is to see how much story can be wrung out of limited source material. Although there is some grainy footage of concerned heads in a control tower and a distant plane on a runway, the main element is audio recordings of the radio conversations between the hijackers' liaison and the negotiator in the control tower. And rather than working with visual montages to accompany those transmissions, Mohaiemen chooses to simply present them without images — just a black screen with a continuous stream of captions.

Even with such a constrained style, the film wrings considerable tension from letting the drama unfold. It helps that it's a captivating story, with a lot of narrative threads to be teased out, including the background of the vicious Japanese Red Army terrorist group (who were so ideologically pure, they had a habit of killing off comrades who weren't adequately forthcoming in undertaking self-criticism); this particular hijacking's position as one of the last where the authorities negotiated with the terrorists (The Japanese government agreed to release several of the faction's imprisoned comrades and pay a multi-million dollar ransom); and the fact that the most "collateral damage" came in the wake of a failed coup that broke out while the hijacked plane was on the ground in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Oh — and, of course, the The Zoo Gang.

Anyone wanting these strands presented in a tidy narrative package should look elsewhere, and anyone simply interested in learning about '70's-era red faction terror might be unsatisfied, but it's rewarding if you're willing to entertain the film's formal constraints.

Rage Against the Darkness: Bunny and Leona (Dir: John Kastner, 85 minutes, Canada)

Made for CBC, this entry in the John Kastner retrospective examines the issues of family relationships and elder care, focusing on the difficult issue of the transition from independent living to an institutional setting. The titular characters are sisters, long-time co-habitants who are suddenly split apart as health issues loom. Sociable younger sister Bunny's multiple sclerosis seems under control when she suffers a stroke that constrains her mobility and confines her to a hospital bed. The fact that she will need the constant care of a nursing home means that older sister Leona must now find a space in a retirement home.

At one level, the film is a celebration of the fact that people never stop growing and changing. Living away from her family for the first time in her life, Leona is miserable at first — then suddenly comes out of her shell and starts enjoying life. Bunny, meanwhile, feels out of place among the older clients of the nursing home and becomes dispirited as her health declines. Meanwhile, children and grandchildren are busy leading their own lives and are sometimes absent when the elders are placed in new and tension-inducung situations.

Given the demographic situation in Canada, the issues in this documentary are even more pressing a decade and a half later. Simply put, as a society we need to take an honest look at the problems involving the myriad small indignities of institutional care. How any measure of dignity can be attained as long as "austerity" is our motivating civic principle is a problem that we're simply doing our utmost not to face. The enormous sympathy and sensitivity that Kastner employs here is a good way to break the ice; the best way we can repay the honour of having been allowed to get so close to Bunny and Leona would be to face the realities of aging openly and honestly.

Espoir Voyage (Dir: Michel K. Zongo, 82 minutes, France/Burkina Faso)

Director Zongo goes on a personal journey that ends up being an illuminating trip through contemporary West Africa. Arid, landlocked Burkina Faso has manpower but not resources, so it's traditional for workers to head away (often to the prosperous Côte d'Ivoire) to make their fortune before returning to buy land and raise a family. Some never return.

Such was the case with Zongo's barely-remembered older brother Joanny, absent for many years before word finally filtered back that he had died. Time passed, but as soon as he was able, Zongo decided to try and fill the absence he was feeling by going on a quest to find "traces" of his brother. Following his journey, we get to see hidden details of life — from the overnight trip through rough roads to life on cocoa plantations. Zongo's search leads him to a fellow villager — his brother's friend who had been the bearer of the tragic news, bringing with him a video message from his mother. From there, we move deeper into the country, picking up more traces.

It's an interesting trip, well-captured by Zongo's camera. There are some moments of slack narrative drift, but seeing all these small details of daily life is the movie's greatest strength.

Pour la suite du monde (Dir: Michel Brault/Pierre Perrault, 105 minutes, Canada)

The residents of Ile aux Coudres in the St. Lawrence River are proud of the fact that their island home was personally discovered by Jacques Cartier, and in the early 60's a lot of the old ways still prevail. This little community has its churches, farms and even a smithy and lives life following the slow turning of the seasons. The islanders celebrate that old Catholicism that's bursting with pagan rituals, from their gifts and invocations aux petites âmes to the drawing of l'eau de Pâques (Easter water), to a cross-dressing mid-Lent celebration that looks similar to Newfoundland's mummering.

One tradition that has faded, however, is the whale hunt. The mouth of the St. Lawrence River is in the path of the annual beluga migration (the islanders call them "porpoises") and for generations they were trapped in miles-long weirs painstakingly constructed during spring's low tides. After the turn of the twentieth century the market for whale products went into decline and eventually the hunt died out.

Wanting to save the hunt-lore known to a band of now-grizzled grandfathers, the islanders decide to revive the tradition. (This has also happened, we are told, at the film-makers' instigation, one element that gives room for discussion on the faux-neutrality of the "direct cinema" approach.) And so, most of the film is devoted to the planning (and arguments) leading up to it, and then the long process involved in reviving the weirs.

This gives Brault and Perrault a lens through which they can observe many facets of island life, and the film fascinates with the cultural snapshot it reveals. On the cusp of what will be a revolutionary change in the larger Québec society, this documentary paints a loving picture of the pure laine old ways, conservative in the original meaning of that word, celebrating a collective sensibility passing down traditions. (And while this film surely does cast a romantic spell over these old ways, let's not forget the stifling limitations of this worldview as well: this film and this society are very much a place for men, with the womenfolk seen occasionally at the edge of the frame, showing one of the fundamental inequalities at play. And as the islanders argue back and forth over whether weir fishing came down to les habitants from les sauvages we catch glimpses of a casual racism that can stand in open view.)

But on the whole, it seems like a good life, and it's the manifestations of "progress" that feel the least warming — from Bobby Hull besting the Habs on a fuzzy television broadcast to a New York roadtrip transporting the fruits of the whale hunt to an aquarium that no longer reads as a scientific paradise for the captured beluga.

This was one of the screenings at the festival that I was most looking forward to, yet it was also by far the least-attended I've seen, with a couple dozen viewers on hand. Just as the residents of Ile aux Coudres came together to preserve their traditions, against the glammy appeal of the new we, as the documentary audience, need to work harder to acknowledge and celebrate our filmed history. If a trip to the retrospective screenings hasn't been in your festival plans this year, I really suggest that you start resolving to change that next year.

This screening was of the 2006 restoration with particularly well-done subtitles. The NFB keeps material like this available to Canadians, so do seek it out. Also note, there's a nice article on Michel Brault in the new issue of Point of View magazine — and I am told there's a stack of free copies available to grab at The Bloor right now.

Thursday, May 3, 2012

Hot Docs 2012: Reviews #5

Reviews of screenings from the 2012 Hot Docs Canadian International Documentary Festival, Toronto, Canada.

Canned Dreams (Dir: Katja Gauriloff, 81 minutes, Finland)

This is a film about what goes into the food we eat. And while there are a lot of shots detailing the workings of the industrial food industry, it's not a Discovery Channel-style "how'd they make it?" outing. Rather, it invites us to think at a more poetic level: when, at every stage of its production, our food passes through so many hands, what do the workers put in of their hopes and dreams? When animals are killed for our consumption, does their fear and pain linger in the bodies we consume?

The film ends with a shot of cans of ravioli in a modern supermarket aisle. How did they get there? Through a series of vignettes, the film shows us the origin of nearly every component — from the scavengers at the bauxite mine that produced the aluminum can to the slaughterhouse workers who killed the cows. And at each stop, while we watch the miners, farmers, butchers and millers at work, we hear them talk, discussing their lives, their hopes, their dreams.

The result is a film that is both instructive on the monumental technology and pan-European journeys involved in our food system (a long journey by truck seems to end every phase) and also driftingly poetic. And although the film invites us to believe that there might be some sort of psychic transference, with so much bitterness and pain ending up in our meals, it also forces us to wonder as the justness and sustainability of a food system that requires so much fossil fuel to move things around and so many workers struggling to get along.

Rather beautifully shot, though the poetic style and pacing may not be to everyone's liking. There are also some sequences that do not shy away from showing us what happens in an abattoir, so those of a particularly delicate constitution should consider themselves warned.

Les ordres (Dir: Michel Brault, 109 minutes, Canada)

The first of a trio of screenings in the festival's Outstanding Achievement Award Retrospective of Michel Brault's works. One of Canada's greatest film-makers, Brault's work encompasses both narrative and documentary work — as well as films that use elements of both. His 1967 Entre la mer et l'eau douce (simply one of the greatest-ever films produced in Canada) employed the NFB's direct cinema approach that it had pioneered for documentaries to a gritty non-doc feature (a similar method that would also inform, say, Goin' Down the Road) and this film would employ a similar methodology. In fact, Les ordres is a docudrama, with the script drawn from extensive interviews.

The film's rigour includes some strange elements, such as when the actors introduce themselves and explain what part they will be playing when we first encounter them. But once the action is underway, it's riveting stuff. Throughout the film, the sentiment that was foremost in my mind was, "how has every Canadian not seen this movie?"

Les ordres is simultaneously a very specific piece of historical accounting (telling the story of those who were unjustly imprisoned without charge after the War Measures Act was invoked during 1970's October Crisis) and a broader Kafkaesque fable of what happens when police are allowed to act with impunity. In both regards, perhaps the film was so striking in the manner that its vivid and terrible affirmation — yes, it can happen here — rings forth to this day when the power of the state decides that self-protection trumps individual rights. We need look no further than the scandal of the G20 summit in Toronto or the ongoing student mobilization in Québec to see how this registers still. And seeing the simple technologies of the carceral state and the brute control of bodies reminds us how little this disciplinary approach has changed.

All of this is captured by Brault's superb eye for light and composition — he has also served as cinematographer on several seminal Québecois films, and here, daily life is rendered in gritty monochrome reminiscent of an Italian neorealist film before switching to bland, washed-out colour during the period of the characters' imprisonment. The plain details of their treatment were foregrounded over the larger social picture, but this still felt like a powerful political statement — even if it didn't fire up my nationalistic sensibilities, I was filled with anger bursting from my chest at the bland competence of the police who were, of course, merely "following orders".

A striking film, then, that needs to be preserved as a part of our history and part of our present moment. But perhaps I was swept up in it too much. As the lights went up at the end and I was trying to tamp down my desire to deliver a molotov cocktail à les flics, the guy in the row in front of me shrugged to his friend and commented, "well, it was a good Canadian film, but in the broader context of world cinema..." and the blood pumping in my ears drowned out whatever else he was saying.

The Outstanding Achievement Award Retrospective series continues with Pour la suite du monde on Thursday, May 3 @ 7:00 PM and a collection of shorts on Friday, May 4 @ 1:00 PM

Wednesday, May 2, 2012

Hot Docs 2012: Reviews #4

Reviews of screenings from the 2012 Hot Docs Canadian International Documentary Festival, Toronto, Canada.

Who Cares (Dir: Rosie Dransfeld, 80 minutes, Canada)

Rosie Dransfeld's Broke, which played HotDocs in 2009, stuck in my memory, so I was interested when I saw that she was returning to the unglamourous streets of Edmonton. Broke was a fairly closed-in film, focusing on a pawnbroker and the customers coming in and out of his shop. Here, we get the sense that Dransfeld could have done almost the same thing for the owner of the drab, low-rent Reno Bar, who looks to have a complicated-but-neighbourly relationship with his clientele, many of whom are on society's margins. Rather tellingly, Tom Petty's "Free Fallin'" is playing in the background during once scene set in the bar.

But it's the subset of patrons who are working prostitutes that Dransfeld focuses on here — and the difficulties they face that gives us the film's title. One of the film's strands follows an RCMP officer whose outreach activities mostly involve collecting DNA samples from sex workers should the worst happen. "It's not gonna make you safer," he admits as he does his rounds.

How can there be a subset of women in our community where we say, "the protection of the State does not apply to you"? We'll make some effort to identify your remains, but otherwise, you're on you're own. To ask that is to answer — we simply edit them out from our conception of community: "nobody ever sees the person. They just see the prostitute," says one of the film's subjects. And another strand follows a couple now-retired sex workers who are trying to create a better life for themselves.

Broke had exhibited a fairly limited technical palette, and in comparison this film is visually richer, taking us on prowls through an empty, late-night version of Edmonton, filled with wide roads and grim low-rise neighbourhoods. The film's less-strong second half drifts a bit, inserting some segments that feel like entries from one subject's video blog in an attempt to impose an uplifting arc, but I thought the film was strongest when it stuck in and near the bar. Still, Dransfeld's best skill remains her patience and sympathy for her subjects, allowing us to hear honest and direct talk from some women who have faced some rough lives. Regardless of whatever exploitation and indignities they've faced, we're given a chance to empathize with them, and I think it's that closeness that I'll remember most from this film.

The Waiting Room (Dir: Pete Nicks, 81 minutes, USA)

In the emergency room at the Highland Hospital in Oakland they arrive on foot and on the bus — they show up here because there's nowhere else they can go. In the American healthcare system, the public hospital is the institution of the last resort, as evidenced by the lengthy queue in the waiting room, as patients are forced to wait hours to be seen.

Allocating limited resources, it seems like doctors and medical staff spend more time shuffling patients in and out of available beds and figuring out how to work the bureaucracy than they do actually treating them — and when a trauma case arrives in the ambulance, staff converge to try and save a life, leaving everyone else waiting even longer. This isn't an extraordinary day at Highland — it's every day.

And so, over the course of the film, we spend a day in the waiting room, listening to the patients' stories and following a few through their experience at the hospital. Parents feel powerless anxiety while guarding over their children, doctors worry about what will happen if they discharge patients with no home to go to, and at the end of it all is the indignity of the billing department. Along the way, there are small moments of grace and comforting and little hints of community, as folks who might not otherwise interact rub shoulders and share the burden of waiting.

The film is observational and absolutely non-didactic, but to watch this while knowing even the slightest context of the American political debate over healthcare is to see it as an indictment of a society that treats its members with such callous disregard. A very good piece of work that needs to be seen widely in its own country — and also here, as a rejoinder to those who want to dismantle one of Canada's most important social institutions.

The Revisionaries (Dir: Scott Thurman, 83 minutes, USA)

It's hard to have a reasoned and logical debate when your opponent's goals are to undermine the foundational use of reason and logic. Welcome to Texas, where fundamentalist so-called Christians and extreme right-wingers are playing the long game, trying to radically shift the terms of discourse by hard-wiring their strange, irrational values into the state's educational curricula. That would mean that all new textbooks would have to conform to the new curricula — and because Texas is such a large bulk customer, other states with less clout would get swept up into buying those same texts inculcating those same values.

Starting with the battle to de-legitimize the Theory of Evolution, the right-wing fringe of the State Board of Education is so over-the-top loonytunes that it's tempting to treat all of this merely as comic fodder — and, indeed, there are plenty of truly funny moments in this film. But as they move from science to social studies, watching the committee pass amendment after whitewashing amendment, creating a strange conservative vision of America squelching all traces of race and class struggle ("delete 'hip-hop' and insert 'country-and-western music'" is one petty-yet-telling amendment) transcends perplexity into outright rage.

And yet, this film's construction and even-handedness would probably mean that someone supporting the ultraconservative faction would find as much here to buttress their position. What might be considered giving the boardmembers copious rhetorical rope with which to hang themselves by one side would be seen as a good showing by the other. Certainly, as director Thurman explained in an enjoyable Q+A session, that's how former chair Don McLeroy felt when he saw the documentary. Whether or not the genial McLeroy is the best advocate of his own position, he animates every frame he on the screen with a sunny obliviousness to facts, reason and logic.

The upshot here is a film that is both enormously entertaining and truly infuriating. It will take someone wiser than me to understand how there can be any sort of meaningful dialogue with people who have such a different value system — and in the meantime, I can only hope that American values like "pragmatic reason" and "separation of church and state" somehow prevail in the great state of Texas.

Tuesday, May 1, 2012

Hot Docs 2012: Reviews #3

Reviews of screenings from the 2012 Hot Docs Canadian International Documentary Festival, Toronto, Canada.

Made In China (Dir: Jian Du, 120 minutes, China)

In one sense, the irony is almost palpable. Working long, long hours for insecure wages in poor conditions, the small garment factory profiled here (one, we are told, of thousands like it in the "workshop of the world") presents a textbook-perfect case for the conditions required for the emergence of a socialist system. Such is the position of the working masses in China's "economic miracle".

But socialism seems very far away from this cut-throat capitalist society, where workers have the right to choose their job and when to leave that job, but not much else. The boss at Jin Yuan Factory is no bloodthirsty, exploiting tyrant, but he's under intense pressure to deliver orders faster and cheaper. In this sense, there's no villains in the piece — just a system that squeezes and squeezes.

Sticking with a hands-off observational style, director Jian Du hints at some of the more immediate problems the workers face, such as the open-frontier lack of the rule of law, as well as the tyranny of the hukou (residency permit) system, which denies migrant workers access to education and social services. As we see them, however, the workers largely shrug and accept the system as it is, trying to make enough money to improve their lives and create opportunities for their children.

The pace is measured and there aren't a lot of big payoffs here. But the film conveys the insecurity and struggle to keep going, and the hope that next year might be better. Along the way, we see them play the lottery, go home for the New Year celebration, and argue with children who are falling in love and dreaming about a life outside the factory walls. Some will find this too slow to engage them, but I enjoyed it. Each of us who slip on an article of clothing with a MADE IN CHINA tag are part of this story — and part of the same system — and I was glad to have a chance to witness the sweat and toil and dreams of the people at the other end. In our global system, we're all closer than we think.

Oma & Bella (Dir: Alexa Karolinski, 75 minutes, Germany/USA)

A delightful portrait of the director's oma (grandmother) and her closest friend, this film is a testament to Jewish resilience and Jewish cooking — as well as the power of friendship. After breaking her hip, Regina invited Bella to stay with her while she recovered, and she has stayed ever since. Now, their days are filled with each other's company as they do the shopping and sightseeing and spend plenty of time cooking the food they remember from their childhoods.

Part of the small community of Displaced Persons who settled in Berlin after World War II, we slowly learn about the incredible lives these women have lived. Both survivors of the Holocaust, Regina and Bella carry some psychic scars from those terrible times, but have persevered with their pluck and fortitude. And though it shaped them, it hasn't kept them from finding joy throughout all their years.

That makes for a sweet and engaging film, well-constructed by Karolinski to give us hints about a lot of their background without getting swept up in historical exposition. Instead, we get a living portrait of Bella and Regina, busy in their kitchen, warm with friendship and love. Recommended.

Screens with the short Grandmothers (Dir: Afarin Eghbal, 9 minutes, UK) which takes an impressionistic look at the work of Las Madres de Plaza de Mayo, the crusading Argentinean human rights organization who marched for decades to raise awareness of the "disappeared" victims of their country's past dictatorship. Layering old footage over stop-motion animation, this has a dream-like tone that took a few minutes of its scant running time to establish its theme. Mothers of the disappeared are now also grandmothers of the found, as children born in detention (who had been adopted off to their captors) are now reclaiming their true identities. Befitting its length, this serves more to present us with this issue than to investigate it in depth, but it still registers emotionally.